↓ Skip to main content

Microdevices for detecting locus-specific DNA methylation at CpG resolution

Overview of attention for article published in Biosensors & Bioelectronics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microdevices for detecting locus-specific DNA methylation at CpG resolution
Published in
Biosensors & Bioelectronics, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.bios.2014.01.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin M. Koo, Eugene J.H. Wee, Sakandar Rauf, Muhammad J.A. Shiddiky, Matt Trau

Abstract

Simple, rapid, and inexpensive strategies for detecting DNA methylation could facilitate routine patient diagnostics. Herein, we describe a microdevice based electrochemical assay for the detection of locus-specific DNA methylation at single CpG dinucleotide resolution after bisulfite conversion of a target DNA sequence. This is achieved by using the ligase chain reaction (LCR) to recognize and amplify a C to T base change at a CpG site and measuring the change electrochemically (eLCR). Unlike other electrochemical detection methods for DNA methylation, methylation specific (MS)-eLCR can potentially interrogate any CpG of interest in the genome. MS-eLCR also distinguishes itself from other electrochemical LCR detection schemes by integrating a peroxidase-mimicking DNAzyme sequence into the LCR amplification probes design which in turn, serves as a redox moiety when bound with a hemin cofactor. Following hybridization to surface-bound capture probes, the DNAzyme-linked LCR products induce electrocatalytic responses that are proportional to the methylation levels of the gene locus in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. The performance of the assay was evaluated by simultaneously detecting C to T changes at a locus associated with cancer metastasis in breast cancer cell lines and serum-derived samples. MS-eLCR required as little as 0.04 pM of starting material and was sensitive to 10-15% methylation change with good reproducibility (RSD=7.9%, n=3). Most importantly, the accuracy of the method in quantifying locus-specific methylation was comparable to both fluorescence-based and Next Generation Sequencing approaches. We thus believe that the proposed assay could potentially be a low cost alternative to current technologies for DNA methylation detection of specific CpG sites.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 35%
Chemistry 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2014.
All research outputs
#16,579,551
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#4,458
of 6,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,857
of 321,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosensors & Bioelectronics
#67
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,846 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.