↓ Skip to main content

Extraction of Bonding Parameter Characterizing Infrared Absorption Intensity of Freon Alternatives by Sensitivity Analysis and Differential Coefficient Analysis of Input Data for Neural Network

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computer Chemistry, Japan, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extraction of Bonding Parameter Characterizing Infrared Absorption Intensity of Freon Alternatives by Sensitivity Analysis and Differential Coefficient Analysis of Input Data for Neural Network
Published in
Journal of Computer Chemistry, Japan, January 2002
DOI 10.2477/jccj.1.1
Authors

Tomoko FUKUDA, Takatoshi MATSUMOTO, Kazutoshi TANABE, Umpei NAGASHIMA, Tomoo AOYAMA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2017.
All research outputs
#15,518,326
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computer Chemistry, Japan
#32
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,229
of 130,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computer Chemistry, Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them