| Title |
Efficiency of markers and methods for detecting hybrids and introgression in stocked populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, March 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-008-9550-0 |
| Authors |
Nuria Sanz, Rosa M. Araguas, Raquel Fernández, Manuel Vera, José-Luis García-Marín |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 53 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Professor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 151 | 71% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Engineering | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,363,356
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#943
of 1,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,277
of 80,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.