↓ Skip to main content

Home sweet home: Does where you live matter to working memory and other cognitive skills?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home sweet home: Does where you live matter to working memory and other cognitive skills?
Published in
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, February 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracy Packiam Alloway, Ross G. Alloway, Samantha Wootan

Abstract

Learning outcomes are associated with a variety of environmental and cognitive factors, and the aim of the current study was to compare the predictive power of these factors in longitudinal outcomes. We recruited children in kindergarten and tested their learning outcomes 2years later. In kindergarten, children completed tests of IQ, phonological awareness, and memory (sentence memory, short-term memory, and working memory). After 2years, they took national assessments in reading, writing, and math. Working memory performance was not affected by socioeconomic status (SES), whereas IQ, phonological awareness, and sentence memory scores differed as a function of SES. A series of hierarchical regression analyses indicated that working memory and phonological awareness were better predictors of learning than any other factors tested, including SES. Educational implications include providing intervention during the early years to boost working memory and phonological awareness so as to prevent subsequent learning difficulties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 175 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 20%
Student > Master 26 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 84 46%
Social Sciences 21 11%
Linguistics 8 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 38 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,580,776
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
#153
of 1,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,766
of 322,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.