↓ Skip to main content

Integrating imaging findings in evaluating the post-chemotherapy brain

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Integrating imaging findings in evaluating the post-chemotherapy brain
Published in
Brain Imaging and Behavior, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11682-013-9239-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. L. Pomykala, M. B. de Ruiter, S. Deprez, B. C. McDonald, D. H. S. Silverman

Abstract

Cognitive complaints following cancer and cancer therapy are common. Many studies have investigated the effects of chemotherapy on the brain. However, the mechanisms for the associated cognitive impairment are not well understood. Some studies have also included brain imaging to investigate potential neurological substrates of cognitive changes. This review examines recent neuroimaging studies on cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction in non-central nervous system cancers and compares findings across imaging modalities. Grey matter volume reductions and decreases in white matter integrity are seen after exposure to adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, and functional studies have illuminated both hypo- and hyperactivations in many of the same regions months to years following therapy. These comparisons can assist in further characterizing the dysfunction reported by patients and contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Neuroscience 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 13 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,363,356
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#863
of 1,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,978
of 194,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Imaging and Behavior
#10
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.