↓ Skip to main content

Interacting effects of vegetation, soils and management on the sensitivity of Australian savanna rangelands to climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Interacting effects of vegetation, soils and management on the sensitivity of Australian savanna rangelands to climate change
Published in
Climatic Change, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10584-011-0236-0
Authors

Nicholas P. Webb, Chris J. Stokes, Joe C. Scanlan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 3%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 8 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 34%
Environmental Science 15 25%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,940,780
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,337
of 5,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,128
of 126,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#72
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.