You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Nonmydriatic Fundus Photography for Teleophthalmology Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Rural and Urban Clinics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Telemedicine Journal (now called Telemedicine Journal and e-Health), November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1089/tmj.2013.0042 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eric K. Chin, Bruna V. Ventura, Kai-Yin See, Joann Seibles, Susanna S. Park |
Abstract |
To evaluate the relative diagnostic value of nonmydriatic fundus photography (nFP) among patients screened for diabetic retinopathy in remote rural medical clinics and an urban academic medical center for nonadherence to recommended annual dilated eye examination. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Other | 21 | 18% |
Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 43% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 13% |
Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,960,693
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Telemedicine Journal (now called Telemedicine Journal and e-Health)
#775
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,677
of 224,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Telemedicine Journal (now called Telemedicine Journal and e-Health)
#21
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.