| Title |
EnVision: taking the pulse of our twin planet
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Experimental Astronomy, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10686-011-9244-3 |
| Authors |
Richard C. Ghail, Colin Wilson, Marina Galand, David Hall, Chris Cochrane, Philippa Mason, Joern Helbert, Franck MontMessin, Sanjay Limaye, Manish Patel, Neil Bowles, Daphne Stam, Jan-Erik Wahlund, Fabio Rocca, David Waltham, Tamsin A. Mather, Juliet Biggs, Matthew Genge, Philippe Paillou, Karl Mitchell, Lionel Wilson, Upendra N. Singh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 31% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,654,607
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Astronomy
#20
of 355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,953
of 123,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Astronomy
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them