Title |
Screening of the spine in adolescents: inter- and intra-rater reliability and measurement error of commonly used clinical tests
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-37 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ellen Aartun, Anna Degerfalk, Linn Kentsdotter, Lise Hestbaek |
Abstract |
Evidence on the reliability of clinical tests used for the spinal screening of children and adolescents is currently lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability and measurement error of clinical tests commonly used when screening young spines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 33% |
Germany | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 82 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
Other | 12 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 14 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
Sports and Recreations | 8 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,131,475
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,148
of 4,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,064
of 311,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#28
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,033 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.