↓ Skip to main content

Investigation of the scaling of roughness and blowing effects on turbulent channel flow

Overview of attention for article published in Experiments in Fluids, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Investigation of the scaling of roughness and blowing effects on turbulent channel flow
Published in
Experiments in Fluids, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00348-014-1675-y
Authors

Mark A. Miller, Alexandre Martin, Sean C. C. Bailey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Korea, Republic of 1 7%
Unknown 12 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 50%
Student > Master 2 14%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 64%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Energy 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,363,356
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Experiments in Fluids
#618
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,630
of 313,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experiments in Fluids
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.