Title |
Nurse-academics' mentorship: rhetoric or reality?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Collegian : journal of the Royal College of Nursing, Australia., January 2005
|
DOI | 10.1016/s1322-7696(08)60491-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Beverley J Turnbull, Kay Roberts |
Abstract |
Mentorship is generally identified in nursing literature as a positive strategy, and one that is said to be beneficial in increasing scholarly productivity. However, previous studies investigating the relationship of mentoring to scholarly productivity have produced equivocal findings. This relationship was examined as part of a study that considered constraints and/or facilitators of scholarly productivity among nurse academics. A survey questionnaire technique was used to establish current scholarly productivity levels, and frame and factor facilitating theory and analysis to identify major constraints and facilitators. Findings showed that while the majority of participants perceived mentoring as important to developing and increasing scholarly productivity, this was less so as academic rank increased. More than a quarter reported never having had a mentor. The burden of teaching and administrative over-load, and a cultural climate of non-support, were described as major disincentives to mentoring. Mentoring was more likely to occur where a collaborative and collegial network to support scholarly productivity existed. However, often it was seen as not available. A workplace environment that is appropriately supported by adequate resources may be as important as the research training that can occur through mentoring. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Other | 9 | 28% |
Unknown | 9 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 31% |