↓ Skip to main content

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): evidence and speculations

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
Title
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV): evidence and speculations
Published in
Archives of Virology, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00705-014-1995-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmed S. Abdel-Moneim

Abstract

In 2012, a novel human coronavirus emerged and was tentatively named "Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus" (MERS-CoV). The high mortality rate of MERS-CoV focused attention on the ecology of the virus. It has been found that MERS-CoV belongs to the group C lineage of the genus Betacoronavirus. Coronavirus surveillance studies in different populations of bats have suggested that they are probable reservoirs for this novel virus, and phylogenetic analysis of both the spike (S1) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase proteins of MERS-CoV have revealed that it is related to bat viruses. Recently, the MERS-CoV and its neutralizing antibodies were detected in dromedary camels. Despite the limited number of reported cases of person-to-person transmission, the rapid evolution of the virus poses a continuous threat to humans worldwide. This paper reviews the current state of knowledge regarding the virology, clinical spectrum, evolution, diagnosis and treatment of MERS-CoV infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 124 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#14,635,004
of 24,942,536 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#2,384
of 4,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,892
of 325,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#22
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,942,536 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.