| Title |
Society of Surgical Oncology–American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stages I and II Invasive Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-014-3481-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meena S. Moran, Stuart J. Schnitt, Armando E. Giuliano, Jay R. Harris, Seema A. Khan, Janet Horton, Suzanne Klimberg, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Gary Freedman, Nehmat Houssami, Peggy L. Johnson, Monica Morrow |
| Abstract |
Controversy exists regarding the optimal margin width in breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 53% |
| Mexico | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 22% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#564,034
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#50
of 7,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,818
of 327,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.