↓ Skip to main content

Bar-coding neurodegeneration: identifying subcellular effects of human neurodegenerative disease proteins using Drosophila leg neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Disease Models and Mechanisms, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bar-coding neurodegeneration: identifying subcellular effects of human neurodegenerative disease proteins using Drosophila leg neurons
Published in
Disease Models and Mechanisms, January 2017
DOI 10.1242/dmm.029637
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josefin Fernius, Annika Starkenberg, Stefan Thor

Abstract

Genetic, biochemical and histological studies have identified a number of different proteins as key drivers of human neurodegenerative diseases. Whereas different proteins are typically involved in different disease, there is also considerable overlap. Addressing disease protein dysfunction in an in vivo neuronal context is often time-consuming and requires labor-intensive analysis of transgenic models. To facilitate the rapid, cellular analysis of disease protein dysfunction, we have developed a fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) adult leg neuron assay. We tested the robustness of 41 transgenic fluorescent reporters, and identified a number that were readily detected in the legs, and could report on different cellular events. To test these reporters, we expressed a number of human proteins involved in neurodegenerative disease, both in their mutated and wild type versions, to address the effects on reporter expression and localization. We observed strikingly different effects of the different disease proteins upon the various reporters, with for example: Aβ(1-42) being highly neuro-toxic, Tau, Parkin and Htt(128Q) affecting mitochondrial distribution/integrity, and Aβ(1-42), Tau, Htt(128Q) and ATX1(82Q) affecting the F-actin network. This study provides proof-of-concept for using the Drosophila adult leg for inexpensive and rapid analysis of cellular effects of neurodegenerative disease proteins in mature neurons.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,393,794
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Disease Models and Mechanisms
#1,124
of 1,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,480
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Disease Models and Mechanisms
#44
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.