↓ Skip to main content

The History of African Village Chickens: an Archaeological and Molecular Perspective

Overview of attention for article published in African Archaeological Review, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
The History of African Village Chickens: an Archaeological and Molecular Perspective
Published in
African Archaeological Review, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10437-013-9128-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. M. Mwacharo, G. Bjørnstad, J. L. Han, O. Hanotte

Abstract

The history of the introduction and dispersal of village chickens across the African continent is a subject of intense debate and speculation among scholars. Here, we synthesize and summarise the current scientific genetic and nongenetic knowledge in relation to the history of the species on the continent. Sociocultural, linguistic, archaeological and historic data all suggest a complex history for the species in Africa, characterized by multiple maritime and/or terrestrial introductions over time and several dispersal routes towards and within Africa. Molecular genetics information supports these observations and in addition suggests possible Asian centers of origin for African domestic chickens, including South Asia and Island Southeast Asia. However, both sets of data were until now too limited in their geographic scope, both within Africa and in comparison with chickens from Asia, to unravel the history of the species in detail. We anticipate that further continent-wide studies combining archaeological, ancient and/or modern genetic information may shed new insights on the history of the species. These will contribute to a deeper understanding of the history of trading networks and human interactions within Africa and between African and Asian societies, at the root of the development and expansion of African civilizations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 99 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 41%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Arts and Humanities 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 6%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 21 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,457,669
of 25,318,210 outputs
Outputs from African Archaeological Review
#111
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,392
of 200,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Archaeological Review
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,318,210 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.