| Title |
A Prospective Study of the Concordance of DSM-IV and DSM-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-017-3200-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Micah O. Mazurek, Frances Lu, Heather Symecko, Eric Butter, Nicole M. Bing, Rachel J. Hundley, Marie Poulsen, Stephen M. Kanne, Eric A. Macklin, Benjamin L. Handen |
| Abstract |
The transition from DSM-IV to DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) sparked considerable concern about the potential implications of these changes. This study was designed to address limitations of prior studies by prospectively examining the concordance of DSM-IV and final DSM-5 criteria on a consecutive sample of 439 children referred for autism diagnostic evaluations. Concordance and discordance were assessed using a consistent diagnostic battery. DSM-5 criteria demonstrated excellent overall specificity and good sensitivity relative to DSM-IV criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were strongest for children meeting DSM-IV criteria for autistic disorder, but poor for those meeting criteria for Asperger's disorder and pervasive developmental disorder. Higher IQ, older age, female sex, and less pronounced ASD symptoms were associated with greater discordance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 22% |
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 80% |
| Scientists | 9 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 52 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,098,191
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#379
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,221
of 318,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#16
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.