| Title |
Sharing biodiversity data: citizen scientists’ concerns and motivations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-017-1391-z |
| Authors |
Wessel Ganzevoort, Riyan J. G. van den Born, Willem Halffman, Sander Turnhout |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 24% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 11% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 74% |
| Scientists | 8 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 217 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 20% |
| Researcher | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Unknown | 46 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 50 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,356,369
of 24,978,429 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#175
of 2,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,006
of 296,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,978,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.