↓ Skip to main content

Online interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review.

Overview of attention for article published in Actas Espanolas de Psiquiatria, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 197)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Online interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review.
Published in
Actas Espanolas de Psiquiatria, May 2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther Parra-Vidales, Felipe Soto-Pérez, Mª Victoria Perea-Bartolomé, Manuel A Franco-Martín, Juan L Muñoz-Sánchez

Abstract

The elderly population is growing driven by the increase in life expectancy, which in turn entails an increase in the number of people with chronic diseases such as dementia. The vast majority of people suffering from this illness is assisted by informal caregivers, who play a key role in fulfilling the patients’ needs, promoting the possibility for people with dementia to live in their home environment. The Internet as a support tool in psychoeducational programs can significantly improve accessibility of them, becoming a currently consolidated interactive resource for the training of patients with acute and chronic diseases, and their caregivers. A literature search of the Pubmed, PsyINFO, Scopus, SciELO and Psicodoc databases was performed to systematically review those studies related to web-based interventions for informal caregivers of people with dementia or cognitive impairment. On balance, the studies show a significant improvement after the psychoeducational intervention. Specifically, the improvement in caregivers’ wellbeing can be observed in the measures for self-efficacy, anxiety and depression. Online interventions are a promising strategy for the care of people with dementia. It would be advisable to perform further randomized trials to assess the reasons for lack of adherence to intervention, as well as usability studies to test the different software programs used.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Student > Master 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 37 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 12%
Psychology 8 12%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 37 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,858,208
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Actas Espanolas de Psiquiatria
#23
of 197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,617
of 324,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Actas Espanolas de Psiquiatria
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them