↓ Skip to main content

Building literacy in alphabetic, abjad and morphosyllabic systems

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Building literacy in alphabetic, abjad and morphosyllabic systems
Published in
Reading and Writing, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11145-011-9334-7
Authors

Liliana Tolchinsky, Iris Levin, Dorit Aram, Catherine McBride-Chang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 12 24%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 13 27%
Psychology 10 20%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Arts and Humanities 4 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,648,703
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#276
of 843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,059
of 130,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.