| Title |
The Effects of Contact on Sexual Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sex Roles, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11199-009-9627-3 |
| Authors |
Sara J. Smith, Amber M. Axelton, Donald A. Saucier |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 10% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 86 | 59% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,128,362
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Sex Roles
#539
of 2,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,752
of 93,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sex Roles
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.