↓ Skip to main content

Age at menarche and lung function: a Mendelian randomization study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Epidemiology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Age at menarche and lung function: a Mendelian randomization study
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10654-017-0272-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dipender Gill, Nuala A. Sheehan, Matthias Wielscher, Nick Shrine, Andre F. S. Amaral, John R. Thompson, Raquel Granell, Bénédicte Leynaert, Francisco Gómez Real, Ian P. Hall, Martin D. Tobin, Juha Auvinen, Susan M. Ring, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Louise V. Wain, John Henderson, Deborah Jarvis, Cosetta Minelli

Abstract

A trend towards earlier menarche in women has been associated with childhood factors (e.g. obesity) and hypothesised environmental exposures (e.g. endocrine disruptors present in household products). Observational evidence has shown detrimental effects of early menarche on various health outcomes including adult lung function, but these might represent spurious associations due to confounding. To address this we used Mendelian randomization where genetic variants are used as proxies for age at menarche, since genetic associations are not affected by classical confounding. We estimated the effects of age at menarche on forced vital capacity (FVC), a proxy for restrictive lung impairment, and ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second to FVC (FEV1/FVC), a measure of airway obstruction, in both adulthood and adolescence. We derived SNP-age at menarche association estimates for 122 variants from a published genome-wide meta-analysis (N = 182,416), with SNP-lung function estimates obtained by meta-analysing three studies of adult women (N = 46,944) and two of adolescent girls (N = 3025). We investigated the impact of departures from the assumption of no pleiotropy through sensitivity analyses. In adult women, in line with previous evidence, we found an effect on restrictive lung impairment with a 24.8 mL increase in FVC per year increase in age at menarche (95% CI 1.8-47.9; p = 0.035); evidence was stronger after excluding potential pleiotropic variants (43.6 mL; 17.2-69.9; p = 0.001). In adolescent girls we found an opposite effect (-56.5 mL; -108.3 to -4.7; p = 0.033), suggesting that the detrimental effect in adulthood may be preceded by a short-term post-pubertal benefit. Our secondary analyses showing results in the same direction in men and boys, in whom age at menarche SNPs have also shown association with sexual development, suggest a role for pubertal timing in general rather than menarche specifically. We found no effect on airway obstruction (FEV1/FVC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 22 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 25 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#13,322,812
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Epidemiology
#1,201
of 1,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,264
of 316,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Epidemiology
#26
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.