↓ Skip to main content

Late Carboniferous lycopsids of the Karantrav locality (the Southern Urals)

Overview of attention for article published in Moscow University Geology Bulletin, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Late Carboniferous lycopsids of the Karantrav locality (the Southern Urals)
Published in
Moscow University Geology Bulletin, June 2017
DOI 10.3103/s0145875217010100
Authors

O. A. Orlova, A. V. Tevelev, D. A. Mamontov, E. V. Anikeeva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2017.
All research outputs
#8,067,841
of 24,223,370 outputs
Outputs from Moscow University Geology Bulletin
#2
of 18 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,874
of 320,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Moscow University Geology Bulletin
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,223,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them