↓ Skip to main content

Inferring short tandem repeat variation from paired-end short reads

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inferring short tandem repeat variation from paired-end short reads
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, December 2013
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkt1313
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minh Duc Cao, Edward Tasker, Kai Willadsen, Michael Imelfort, Sailaja Vishwanathan, Sridevi Sureshkumar, Sureshkumar Balasubramanian, Mikael Bodén

Abstract

The advances of high-throughput sequencing offer an unprecedented opportunity to study genetic variation. This is challenged by the difficulty of resolving variant calls in repetitive DNA regions. We present a Bayesian method to estimate repeat-length variation from paired-end sequence read data. The method makes variant calls based on deviations in sequence fragment sizes, allowing the analysis of repeats at lengths of relevance to a range of phenotypes. We demonstrate the method's ability to detect and quantify changes in repeat lengths from short read genomic sequence data across genotypes. We use the method to estimate repeat variation among 12 strains of Arabidopsis thaliana and demonstrate experimentally that our method compares favourably against existing methods. Using this method, we have identified all repeats across the genome, which are likely to be polymorphic. In addition, our predicted polymorphic repeats also included the only known repeat expansion in A. thaliana, suggesting an ability to discover potential unstable repeats.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Italy 2 2%
Norway 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 83 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 27%
Computer Science 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,495,686
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#11,210
of 27,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,720
of 307,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#133
of 362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.