↓ Skip to main content

Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Issues in Diagnosis and Treatment in Children

Overview of attention for article published in Indian Journal of Pediatrics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Issues in Diagnosis and Treatment in Children
Published in
Indian Journal of Pediatrics, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12098-013-1280-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajni Sharma, Anju Seth

Abstract

Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a common disorder of impaired adrenal cortisol biosynthesis with associated androgen excess. The clinical presentation of 21-hydroxylase deficiency, the commonest cause of CAH, forms a spectrum and can be divided into classic and non-classic types. The former consists of life threatening salt wasting and non-life threatening simple virilizing phenotypes. Patients with the non-classic form are asymptomatic or have mild features of androgen excess. Most developed countries have newborn screening facilities for CAH. In the absence of newborn screening, the diagnosis of CAH may be missed or delayed. This can result in neonatal mortality in salt wasting forms and incorrect sex of rearing in females with simple virilizing form. The diagnosis is reached by demonstrating high serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP) levels. Preterm birth and neonatal illness can cause physiological elevation of 17OHP, thus complicating the diagnosis of CAH in the newborn period. Prenatal diagnosis and treatment with dexamethasone to prevent virilization of affected female fetuses is another area of controversy. The management of CAH is complicated by the need to use supraphysiologic doses of glucocorticoids to suppress adrenal androgen synthesis. In this review, the authors address pertinent issues related to the diagnosis and management of CAH in children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 17%
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 26 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 40%
Psychology 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,189,417
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#857
of 1,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,161
of 302,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Indian Journal of Pediatrics
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.