↓ Skip to main content

The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable

Overview of attention for article published in Social Choice and Welfare, September 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The majoritarian compromise is majoritarian-optimal and subgame-perfect implementable
Published in
Social Choice and Welfare, September 1999
DOI 10.1007/s003550050164
Authors

Murat R. Sertel, Bilge Yılmaz

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 10%
Colombia 1 10%
Unknown 8 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 40%
Engineering 2 20%
Mathematics 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Social Choice and Welfare
#187
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,515
of 35,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Choice and Welfare
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.