↓ Skip to main content

第一次・第二次満蒙独立運動

Overview of attention for article published in International Relations, July 1958
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
第一次・第二次満蒙独立運動
Published in
International Relations, July 1958
DOI 10.11375/kokusaiseiji1957.6_52
Authors

栗原 健

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2020.
All research outputs
#7,717,825
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Relations
#242
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199
of 1,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Relations
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them