↓ Skip to main content

Patients’ perspectives on the educational preparation of cardiac nurses

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients’ perspectives on the educational preparation of cardiac nurses
Published in
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, September 2013
DOI 10.1177/1474515113507166
Pubmed ID
Authors

John W Albarran, Ian Jones, Lesley Lockyer, Sarah Manns, Helen Cox, David R Thompson

Abstract

Background:Over the last two decades the UK health service has endeavoured to place patient and public involvement at the heart of its modernisation agenda. Despite these aspirations the role of patients in the development of nursing curricula remains limited.Aim:A descriptive qualitative design was used to explore the views of cardiac patients about the educational preparation of cardiac nurses.Method:Eight participants attending an annual conference of a patient and carer support group were recruited to the study. A focus group was conducted to explore their views on how the educational preparation of cardiac nurses in the UK should develop. Tape-recorded data were transcribed and a thematic analysis was undertaken.Findings:Four themes were identified: contradictions around practice and education; demonstrating compassion; delivering rehabilitation expertise; leadership in practice. Participants perceived that they had a valuable role in the educational development of nurses, enhancing nurses' understanding of how individuals live and adjust to living with cardiovascular disease.Conclusion:Cardiac patients believe that the education of cardiac nurses should be driven by experiences in practice, nevertheless they want nurses to be equipped to deliver care that is underpinned by a strong knowledge base and skills combined with an ability to engage, educate and deliver high quality care that is both compassionate and individualised.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 24 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#657
of 839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,687
of 204,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.