You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
救急救命士らが現場でJapan Coma Scale(JCS)=1と判定した症例は意識障害として扱うべきである
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.11240/jsem.19.21 |
| Authors |
山口 陽子, 田中 博之 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#6,381,251
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#15
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,996
of 407,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them