↓ Skip to main content

Antioxidant uric acid in treated and untreated subjects with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Antioxidant uric acid in treated and untreated subjects with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00406-017-0817-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Bartoli, Giulia Trotta, Cristina Crocamo, Maria Rosaria Malerba, Massimo Clerici, Giuseppe Carrà

Abstract

Pathophysiological mechanisms of major depressive disorder (MDD) seem to be associated with oxidative stress pathways and altered purinergic metabolism. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate if subjects with MDD might have reduced levels of antioxidant uric acid, considering also potential influence of antidepressant treatment. We searched the main Electronic Databases, identifying 14 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses were carried out generating pooled Hedges' g and mean differences (MDs), using random-effects models. Heterogeneity across studies and risk of publication bias were estimated using standard methods. Relevant sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were conducted. Subjects with MDD had levels of uric acid lower than healthy controls (Hedges' g = -0.30; p = 0.003). Overall between-study heterogeneity was high (I (2) = 76.3%). The effect was significant among studies including drug naïve/free MDD individuals (Hedges' g = -0.55; p = 0.023), but not among those involving treated subjects (Hedges' g = -0.15; p = 0.062). Relevant quality- and heterogeneity-based sensitivity analyses, as well as meta-regressions, confirmed these findings. In addition, uric acid levels significantly, though inconsistently (I (2) = 79.2%), increased after treatment (MD = +0.71 mg/dL; p < 0.001), regardless of follow-up duration (p = 0.518). Our meta-analysis shows that subjects with MDD have lower levels of uric acid. Since antidepressant treatment seems to influence this association, our findings support the hypothesis that uric acid levels may represent a state marker of MDD. Nevertheless, the potential role of additional factors that might clarify the nature of this association deserves further research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 17 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 33%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Psychology 5 9%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,375,688
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#1,197
of 1,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,611
of 331,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.