You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparative analysis of biosimilar vs. originator filgrastim in combination with plerixafor for stem cell mobilization in lymphoma and multiple myeloma: a propensity‐score weighted multicenter approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Hematology, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ajh.24817 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Lanza, Francesco Saraceni, Annalisa Pezzi, Massimo Martino, Alberto Bosi, Nicola Cascavilla, Pellegrino Musto, Eliana Zuffa, Monica Tani, Claudia Cellini, Daniele Laszlo, Francesca Bonifazi, on behalf of GITMO |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pakistan | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 26% |
| Researcher | 5 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 43% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#14,217,108
of 24,484,013 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Hematology
#2,191
of 3,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,947
of 320,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Hematology
#33
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,484,013 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.