| Title |
Indigenous arthropod natural enemies of the invasive brown marmorated stink bug in North America and Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pest Science, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10340-017-0891-7 |
| Authors |
Paul K. Abram, Kim A. Hoelmer, Angelita Acebes-Doria, Heather Andrews, Elizabeth H. Beers, J. Christopher Bergh, Ric Bessin, David Biddinger, Paul Botch, Matthew L. Buffington, Mary L. Cornelius, Elena Costi, Ernest S. Delfosse, Christine Dieckhoff, Rachelyn Dobson, Zachary Donais, Matthew Grieshop, George Hamilton, Tim Haye, Christopher Hedstrom, Megan V. Herlihy, Mark S. Hoddle, Cerruti R. R. Hooks, Peter Jentsch, Neelendra K. Joshi, Thomas P. Kuhar, Jesus Lara, Jana C. Lee, Ana Legrand, Tracy C. Leskey, David Lowenstein, Lara Maistrello, Clarissa R. Mathews, Joshua M. Milnes, William R. Morrison, Anne L. Nielsen, Emily C. Ogburn, Charles H. Pickett, Kristin Poley, John Pote, James Radl, Paula M. Shrewsbury, Elijah Talamas, Luciana Tavella, James F. Walgenbach, Rebeccah Waterworth, Donald C. Weber, Celeste Welty, Nik G. Wiman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 75 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Linguistics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 47 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2023.
All research outputs
#5,940,780
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pest Science
#137
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,975
of 317,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pest Science
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.