↓ Skip to main content

The effects of aerobic exercise training at two different intensities in obesity and type 2 diabetes: implications for oxidative stress, low-grade inflammation and nitric oxide production

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
Title
The effects of aerobic exercise training at two different intensities in obesity and type 2 diabetes: implications for oxidative stress, low-grade inflammation and nitric oxide production
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00421-013-2769-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mauricio Krause, Josianne Rodrigues-Krause, Ciara O’Hagan, Paul Medlow, Gareth Davison, Davide Susta, Colin Boreham, Philip Newsholme, Mark O’Donnell, Colin Murphy, Giuseppe De Vito

Abstract

To investigate the effect of 16 weeks of aerobic training performed at two different intensities on nitric oxide (tNOx) availability and iNOS/nNOS expression, oxidative stress (OS) and inflammation in obese humans with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 259 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 19%
Student > Bachelor 36 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Researcher 21 8%
Other 50 19%
Unknown 55 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 58 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 64 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,985
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,838
of 224,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#33
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.