| Title |
Association between flow skewness and aortic dilatation in patients with aortic stenosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10554-017-1196-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hojin Ha, Hyun Jung Koo, June Goo Lee, Guk Bae Kim, Jihoon Kweon, Sang Joon Lee, Joon Won Kang, Tae Hwan Lim, Dae Hee Kim, Jong Min Song, Duk Hyun Kang, Jae Kwan Song, Young Hak Kim, Namkug Kim, Dong Hyun Yang |
| Abstract |
We investigated association between hemodynamic characteristics and aortic dilatation in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Eighty patients with severe AS (mean age, 67.2 ± 12.5 years) who underwent multi-detector computed tomography and phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging at the ascending aorta were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with an ascending aorta diameter >4 cm had a significantly higher forward flow rate at systole (28.5 ± 6.0 vs. 36.2 ± 8.6 L min, P < 0.001), and retrograde flow rate at systole (11.3 ± 4.2 vs. 18.8 ± 5.8 L min, P < 0.001), fractional reverse ratio (a ratio of retrograde flow rate to forward flow rate; 34.1 ± 11.9% vs. 43.5 ± 18.0%, P = 0.014), flow skewness Rskewness (a ratio of sum of forward and retrograde systole flow to net systole flow rate; 2.4 ± 0.7 vs. 3.2 ± 1.0, P < 0.001). The presence of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV; odds ratio [OR] 72.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.57-490.46, P < 0.001), Left ventricular mass index (LVMI; OR 1.02 /g/m(2); CI 1.00-1.04, P = 0.043) and Rskewness (OR 5.6 per 1, 95% CI 1.8-17.1, P = 0.001) were associated with aortic dilatation. BAV, LVMI, and increased Rskewness in the ascending aorta are associated with aortic dilatation in patients with AS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 24% |
| Engineering | 6 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2017.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,116
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,959
of 317,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#35
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.