| Title |
Rapid Growth in Use of Personal Health Records in New York, 2012–2013
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-2792-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica S. Ancker, Michael Silver, Rainu Kaushal |
| Abstract |
Giving patients access to their own medical data may help improve communication and engage patients in healthcare. As a result, the federal electronic health record (EHR) incentive program requires providers to offer electronic data sharing with patients via personal health records (PHRs) or other technologies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 45% |
| Italy | 2 | 18% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| Argentina | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 25% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 24% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2016.
All research outputs
#1,980,174
of 24,208,207 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,534
of 7,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,131
of 322,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#19
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,208,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.