| Title |
Evidence for the Necessity to Systematically Assess Micronutrient Status Prior to Bariatric Surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Obesity Surgery, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11695-008-9545-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara Ernst, Martin Thurnheer, Sebastian M. Schmid, Bernd Schultes |
| Abstract |
Bariatric surgery has been proven the most effective treatment of morbid obesity, but micronutrient deficiency following bariatric surgery is a major concern. Increasing evidence points to a generally poor micronutrient status in obese subjects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 23% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2014.
All research outputs
#17,548,753
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#2,368
of 3,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,500
of 97,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#31
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.