↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the effect of honey and mefenamic acid on the severity of pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 2,329)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
46 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the effect of honey and mefenamic acid on the severity of pain in women with primary dysmenorrhea
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00404-017-4409-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ë Leila Amiri Farahani, Seyedeh Batool Hasanpoor-Azghdy, Hengameh Kasraei, Tooba Heidari

Abstract

Primary dysmenorrhea starts simultaneously with menstruation or before it and usually continues for 48-72 h. As a prevalence disorder, it affects about 80-97% of women in the reproductive age. The conventional treatment modalities of primary dysmenorrhea are associated with complications and side effects. In addition, there is a lack of knowledge of the effect of honey on the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of honey on the severity of pain in women with dysmenorrhea. A randomized crossover clinical trial was conducted on 56 female students. Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups. Groups I and II received honey and mefenamic acid in the 'first treatment period', respectively. In the 'second treatment period', the intervention methods were reversed between the groups. Samples recorded the severity of pain during the first 3 days of menstruation. There were no significant differences in the most severe level of pain in the first and second months of the first treatment period, and the first and second months of the second treatment period between the groups. Honey and the mefenamic acid capsules led to the same amount of pain relief in women with primary dysmenorrhea. Honey is suggested to be used for pain relief due to its lower side effects and pharmacological complications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 19%
Student > Master 15 17%
Other 6 7%
Researcher 4 4%
Lecturer 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 35 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 39 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,152,158
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#41
of 2,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,078
of 318,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.