You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is sex estimation from handprints in prehistoric cave art reliable? A view from biological and forensic anthropology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jas.2014.01.028 |
| Authors |
Patrik Galeta, Jaroslav Bruzek, Martina Lázničková-Galetová |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,625,053
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#395
of 3,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,685
of 243,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#11
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.