| Title |
Vaginal prolapse surgery with transvaginal mesh: results of the Austrian registry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-014-2333-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
V. Bjelic-Radisic, T. Aigmueller, O. Preyer, G. Ralph, I. Geiss, G. Müller, P. Riss, P. Klug, M. Konrad, G. Wagner, M. Medl, W. Umek, P. Lozano, K. Tamussino, A. Tammaa, for the Austrian Urogynecology Working Group |
| Abstract |
Several mesh repair systems for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were introduced into clinical practice with limited data on safety, complications or success rates, and impact on sexual function. The Austrian Urogynecology Working Group initiated a registry to assess the use of transvaginal mesh devices for POP repair. We looked at perioperative data, as well as outcomes at 3 and 12 months. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 45% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,572,458
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#160
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,111
of 329,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#3
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.