↓ Skip to main content

Age estimation and lead–radium dating of Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in the Ross Sea

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Age estimation and lead–radium dating of Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni) in the Ross Sea
Published in
Polar Biology, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00300-010-0883-z
Authors

Cassandra M. Brooks, Allen H. Andrews, Julian R. Ashford, Nakul Ramanna, Christopher D. Jones, Craig C. Lundstrom, Gregor M. Cailliet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Russia 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 2 4%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 38%
Environmental Science 11 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,531,527
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#600
of 1,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,440
of 99,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.