↓ Skip to main content

The anatomy and ultrastructure of the antennal circulatory organs in the cockchafer beetle Melolontha melolontha L. (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Zoomorphology, October 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
The anatomy and ultrastructure of the antennal circulatory organs in the cockchafer beetle Melolontha melolontha L. (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae)
Published in
Zoomorphology, October 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf00310078
Authors

Günther Pass

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 25%
Chile 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 38%
Student > Postgraduate 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 88%
Neuroscience 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,531,527
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from Zoomorphology
#115
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,726
of 6,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoomorphology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them