↓ Skip to main content

Amyloid plaques beyond Aβ: a survey of the diverse modulators of amyloid aggregation

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 898)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Amyloid plaques beyond Aβ: a survey of the diverse modulators of amyloid aggregation
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12551-017-0271-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katie L. Stewart, Sheena E. Radford

Abstract

Aggregation of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide is strongly correlated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent research has improved our understanding of the kinetics of amyloid fibril assembly and revealed new details regarding different stages in plaque formation. Presently, interest is turning toward studying this process in a holistic context, focusing on cellular components which interact with the Aβ peptide at various junctures during aggregation, from monomer to cross-β amyloid fibrils. However, even in isolation, a multitude of factors including protein purity, pH, salt content, and agitation affect Aβ fibril formation and deposition, often producing complicated and conflicting results. The failure of numerous inhibitors in clinical trials for AD suggests that a detailed examination of the complex interactions that occur during plaque formation, including binding of carbohydrates, lipids, nucleic acids, and metal ions, is important for understanding the diversity of manifestations of the disease. Unraveling how a variety of key macromolecular modulators interact with the Aβ peptide and change its aggregation properties may provide opportunities for developing therapies. Since no protein acts in isolation, the interplay of these diverse molecules may differentiate disease onset, progression, and severity, and thus are worth careful consideration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 28%
Chemistry 18 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Neuroscience 9 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 27 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,652,343
of 24,946,857 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#38
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,433
of 322,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,946,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.