↓ Skip to main content

Usage history of scientific literature: Nature metrics and metrics of Nature publications

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Usage history of scientific literature: Nature metrics and metrics of Nature publications
Published in
Scientometrics, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11192-013-1167-5
Authors

Xianwen Wang, Wenli Mao, Shenmeng Xu, Chunbo Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 5 5%
United States 3 3%
Canada 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 84 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 9 9%
Other 31 30%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 36 34%
Computer Science 26 25%
Arts and Humanities 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 12 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,164,088
of 24,143,470 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#447
of 2,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,069
of 217,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,143,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.