↓ Skip to main content

Dose adjustment of carboplatin in patients on hemodialysis

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Oncology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Dose adjustment of carboplatin in patients on hemodialysis
Published in
Medical Oncology, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s12032-014-0848-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Achuta K. Guddati, Parijat S. Joy, Creticus P. Marak

Abstract

Carboplatin is one of the most prescribed cytotoxic drug, which is extensively used in the treatment regimens of several malignancies. The therapeutic efficiency of carboplatin has been found to correlate the area under curve (AUC). The Calvert formula has been extensively used to determine the dose of carboplatin for a fixed AUC and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This formula has also been used in patients with end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis by assuming that the GFR is zero. This is applicable to patients who receive hemodialysis within 12-18 h after carboplatin infusion. After the first 24 h, a majority of the carboplatin is bound to proteins is not easily dialyzable and hence continues to remain in the blood stream despite repeated sessions of hemodialysis. We derive a correction factor to calculate the resultant AUC in such patients. The analysis done by using this correction factor shows that the AUC can increase by eightfold in patients who received the adjusted dose but whose hemodialysis was delayed beyond 24 h after infusion. The correction factor proposed here can also be used to calculate the dose adjustment required a priori in patients who may receive delayed hemodialysis. It is also useful to predict the AUC and estimate the resultant toxicity in such patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Unknown 5 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2014.
All research outputs
#12,893,599
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Medical Oncology
#490
of 1,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,127
of 305,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Oncology
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,285 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.