↓ Skip to main content

Snake venom components and their applications in biomedicine

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
260 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
480 Mendeley
Title
Snake venom components and their applications in biomedicine
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, November 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00018-006-6315-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. C. I. Koh, A. Armugam, K. Jeyaseelan

Abstract

Snake envenomation is a socio-medical problem of considerable magnitude. About 2.5 million people are bitten by snakes annually, more than 100,000 fatally. However, although bites can be deadly, snake venom is a natural biological resource that contains several components of potential therapeutic value. Venom has been used in the treatment of a variety of pathophysiological conditions in Ayurveda, homeopathy and folk medicine. With the advent of biotechnology, the efficacy of such treatments has been substantiated by purifying components of venom and delineating their therapeutic properties. This review will focus on certain snake venom components and their applications in health and disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 480 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Sudan 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 462 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 115 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 17%
Student > Master 59 12%
Researcher 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 75 16%
Unknown 89 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 86 18%
Chemistry 32 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 26 5%
Other 51 11%
Unknown 104 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,415,851
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#318
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,856
of 69,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#4
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.