↓ Skip to main content

Aquifer-yield continuum as a guide and typology for science-based groundwater management

Overview of attention for article published in Hydrogeology Journal, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Aquifer-yield continuum as a guide and typology for science-based groundwater management
Published in
Hydrogeology Journal, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10040-012-0910-y
Authors

Suzanne A. Pierce, John M. Sharp, Joseph H. A. Guillaume, Robert E. Mace, David J. Eaton

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 27%
Researcher 9 17%
Other 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 25%
Environmental Science 10 19%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Engineering 5 10%
Decision Sciences 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2014.
All research outputs
#15,293,290
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Hydrogeology Journal
#488
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,349
of 175,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hydrogeology Journal
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.