↓ Skip to main content

Correction of hypokyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using sublaminar bands: a 3D multicenter study

Overview of attention for article published in European Spine Journal, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Correction of hypokyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using sublaminar bands: a 3D multicenter study
Published in
European Spine Journal, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00586-017-5166-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brice Ilharreborde, Sébastien Pesenti, Emmanuelle Ferrero, Franck Accadbled, Jean-Luc Jouve, Jérôme Sales De Gauzy, Keyvan Mazda

Abstract

The comparison of implants and correction methods remain controversial in AIS. Excellent frontal and axial correction rates have been reported with all-screw constructs, but at the expense of sagittal alignment, which has a tendency to flatten postoperatively. Posteromedial translation using hybrid constructs seems to preserve and improve thoracic kyphosis (TK), but no series exist to date with a significant number of hypokyphotic patients. In addition, the measures of TK in 2D are often wrong in severe AIS due to axial rotation. The goals of this study were therefore to analyze the 3D radiological outcomes of a group of hypokyphotic AIS patients operated with sublaminar bands. 35 consecutive AIS hypokyphotic patients (T4T12 <15°) operated in three centers were included, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The surgical technique was similar in all centers, associating lumbar pedicle screws and thoracic sublaminar bands. Posteromedial translation was the main correction technique, and no patient underwent prior anterior release. 3D spinal reconstructions were performed preoperatively, postoperatively and at the latest follow-up by an independent observer using SterEOS (EOS imaging, Paris, France), and 2D and 3D measurements were compared. In addition, a new 3D parameter [sagittal shift of the apical vertebra (SSAV)], reflecting the translation of the apical vertebra of the main curve in the patient sagittal plane, was described and reported. The age of the cohort was 16 years and the number of sublaminar bands used for correction averaged 6 (±1.5). T1T12 and T4T12 sagittal Cobb angles appeared to be overestimated on 2D postoperatively (3°, p = 0.002 and 4°, p < 0.001, respectively). Hence, only 3D measurements were kept for the quantitative analysis of the postoperative correction. T4T12 TK significantly increased after surgery (average 8° ± 7°, p < 0.001), but 11 patients (31.4%) remained hypokyphotic. Seven out of the eight patients (87.5%) who presented a thoracic lordosis (i.e., T4T12 <0°) preoperatively were corrected after surgery (mean gain 16° ± 4°). A posterior shift (positive SSAV) of the apical vertebra was reported in 24 patients (68.6%). In this subgroup, the mean SSAV was +2 cm (±1). Good correlation was found between the SSAV and the postoperative change in 3D T4T12 kyphosis (r = 0.62). Measures in 2D tend to overestimate sagittal alignment and are not sufficient to evaluate postoperative correction. SSAV is a new 3D parameter reflecting the TK change that needs to be further investigated and used in the future. This series confirms that sublaminar bands should be considered in hypokyphotic patients, since thoracic sagittal alignment was restored in 68.6% of the cases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 52%
Chemistry 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2017.
All research outputs
#14,941,384
of 22,981,247 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,944
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,777
of 317,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#37
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,981,247 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.