↓ Skip to main content

Integrated Genomic Characterization Reveals Novel, Therapeutically Relevant Drug Targets in FGFR and EGFR Pathways in Sporadic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Genetics, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated Genomic Characterization Reveals Novel, Therapeutically Relevant Drug Targets in FGFR and EGFR Pathways in Sporadic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Published in
PLoS Genetics, February 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mitesh J. Borad, Mia D. Champion, Jan B. Egan, Winnie S. Liang, Rafael Fonseca, Alan H. Bryce, Ann E. McCullough, Michael T. Barrett, Katherine Hunt, Maitray D. Patel, Scott W. Young, Joseph M. Collins, Alvin C. Silva, Rachel M. Condjella, Matthew Block, Robert R. McWilliams, Konstantinos N. Lazaridis, Eric W. Klee, Keith C. Bible, Pamela Harris, Gavin R. Oliver, Jaysheel D. Bhavsar, Asha A. Nair, Sumit Middha, Yan Asmann, Jean-Pierre Kocher, Kimberly Schahl, Benjamin R. Kipp, Emily G. Barr Fritcher, Angela Baker, Jessica Aldrich, Ahmet Kurdoglu, Tyler Izatt, Alexis Christoforides, Irene Cherni, Sara Nasser, Rebecca Reiman, Lori Phillips, Jackie McDonald, Jonathan Adkins, Stephen D. Mastrian, Pamela Placek, Aprill T. Watanabe, Janine LoBello, Haiyong Han, Daniel Von Hoff, David W. Craig, A. Keith Stewart, John D. Carpten

Abstract

Advanced cholangiocarcinoma continues to harbor a difficult prognosis and therapeutic options have been limited. During the course of a clinical trial of whole genomic sequencing seeking druggable targets, we examined six patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Integrated genome-wide and whole transcriptome sequence analyses were performed on tumors from six patients with advanced, sporadic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (SIC) to identify potential therapeutically actionable events. Among the somatic events captured in our analysis, we uncovered two novel therapeutically relevant genomic contexts that when acted upon, resulted in preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. Genome-wide structural analysis of sequence data revealed recurrent translocation events involving the FGFR2 locus in three of six assessed patients. These observations and supporting evidence triggered the use of FGFR inhibitors in these patients. In one example, preliminary anti-tumor activity of pazopanib (in vitro FGFR2 IC50≈350 nM) was noted in a patient with an FGFR2-TACC3 fusion. After progression on pazopanib, the same patient also had stable disease on ponatinib, a pan-FGFR inhibitor (in vitro, FGFR2 IC50≈8 nM). In an independent non-FGFR2 translocation patient, exome and transcriptome analysis revealed an allele specific somatic nonsense mutation (E384X) in ERRFI1, a direct negative regulator of EGFR activation. Rapid and robust disease regression was noted in this ERRFI1 inactivated tumor when treated with erlotinib, an EGFR kinase inhibitor. FGFR2 fusions and ERRFI mutations may represent novel targets in sporadic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and trials should be characterized in larger cohorts of patients with these aberrations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 216 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Master 20 9%
Other 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 57 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2020.
All research outputs
#2,080,257
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#1,688
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,307
of 329,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#45
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.