| Title |
The evolutionary demography of duplicate genes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics, March 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1022696612931 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Lynch, John S. Conery |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 192 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 28% |
| Researcher | 60 | 27% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 157 | 70% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,787,159
of 25,380,192 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#4
of 104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,819
of 62,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.