Title |
Fluoroscopic Targeting of Wallstents and Amplatzer Vascular Plugs in Sharp Recanalization of Chronic Venous Occlusions
|
---|---|
Published in |
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, June 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00270-017-1724-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Minhaj S. Khaja, Jeffrey Forris Beecham Chick, Ari D. Schuman, Kyle J. Cooper, Bill S. Majdalany, Wael E. Saad, David M. Williams |
Abstract |
Sharp recanalization of chronic venous occlusions is usually performed with targeting of wire-capture devices like loop snares or balloons. We describe sharp recanalization of chronic venous occlusions using self-expanding stents and vascular plugs. We retrospectively reviewed all sharp venous recanalization procedures performed over an 11-month period and found Wallstent and Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP) targeting was performed in 16 patients. Patient demographics, occlusion site, targeting device, technical success of the targeting, and overall procedural success were recorded. Technical success was achieved in twelve (86%) Wallstent and two (67%) AVP deployments. Procedural success was achieved in 15 (94%). Three minor complications occurred. Wallstent and AVP targeting may be a useful technique when performing sharp recanalization for chronic venous occlusions. These devices expand the target space and present the same cross section viewed from any angle and can directly capture and extract the wire, features helpful in regions with crowded vascular anatomy. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 62% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 4% |
Georgia | 1 | 4% |
Brazil | 1 | 4% |
Spain | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 42% |
Members of the public | 10 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 15% |
Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 3 | 25% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 58% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |