You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
History matters for a stirred superfluid
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1038/506166a |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Matthew J. Davis, Kristian Helmerson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 43% |
Researcher | 3 | 21% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Physics and Astronomy | 11 | 79% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2014.
All research outputs
#5,699,281
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#60,376
of 90,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,329
of 313,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#726
of 926 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 926 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.